| CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS & RESEARCH MINISTRY | www.carm.org |
|
|
Is
the ending of Mark really scripture? There is dispute over Mark 16:9-20 and whether or not it should be included in the New Testament. It is found in many old manuscripts but is omitted in two of the earliest complete copies of the Bible known as the Vaticanus (350 AD) and Sinaiticus (375 AD). Additionally, there is another ending to Mark in some old manuscripts that is substituted for 9-20. The alternate ending reads as follows:
Some
scholars have asserted that the ending is in a different style than the rest
of the gospel and that it contains 16-22 "non-marcan" words used in a "non-marcan"
sense. It seems to suggest that Jesus appeared in a different form (v.
12) which could be problematic
since Jesus rose in the same body He died in (John
2:19-21). Also, Mark
16:16 can be interpreted to mean that baptism is part of salvation.
It isn't as is testified by verses that teach justification by faith
Rom. 5:1;
6:23;
Eph. 2:8-9, etc.). Whichever the
case, the dispute is not settled and may never be. The text of Mark 16:9-20
"Now after He had risen early on the first day of the week, He first
appeared to Mary Magdalene, from whom He had cast out seven demons. 10She
went and reported to those who had been with Him, while they were mourning
and weeping. 11And when they heard that He was alive, and had
been seen by her, they refused to believe it. Return to
Bible Difficulties - Matthew to
Mark |